No Helmet Law
Because cycle helmet laws are unnecessary and they don't work.
Skip to content
Skip to content
  • Home
  • Welcome
  • Common viewpoints
    • Helmets should be compulsory for all cyclists
    • Helmets should be compulsory for children
    • Helmets should be strongly promoted
    • Wearing a helmet sets a good example
    • Helmets improve safety
    • Not enough cyclists wear helmets
    • Helmets are an irrelevance
  • Headline concepts
    • Design parameters
    • Is cycling dangerous?
    • The hierarchy of safety
    • Do helmets work?
    • Have helmet laws worked elsewhere?
    • All the evidence says…
  • Commentary
    • A Tale Of Two Children
    • False claims
    • If you won’t wear one….
    • Why the anti-helmet zealotry?
    • Soundbytes
    • Cycling head injuries
    • Q&A
    • Obsessive-compulsive disorder
    • Updates
  • Why helmet laws fail
    • Why helmet laws fail 1: Before you ride
    • Why helmet laws fail 2: Look before you leap
    • Why helmet laws fail 3: Now you see me
    • Why helmet laws fail 4: The 85% solution
    • Why helmet laws fail 5: How injured is injured?
  • Actions
    • Find out more
    • Join in
    • Promote safe cycling
    • Contact me
  • About nohelmetlaw
    • FAQ
    • Site Map
  • No Helmet Law > Headline concepts

Headline concepts

The headline concepts addressed by this site are:

  • Helmet design parameters
  • Is cycling really dangerous?
  • The hierarchy of safety
  • Do cycle helmets work?
  • Have helmet laws worked elsewhere?
  • All the evidence says… 

Comments are closed.

  • External links

    • Bicycle Helmet Research Foundation Research and analysis
    • Wrongheaded Site campaigning against proposed NI law
  • Recent Changes

    • Headline concepts
    • Not enough cyclists wear helmets
    • Why helmet laws fail 3: Now you see me
    • About nohelmetlaw
    • Do helmets work?
    • Welcome
    • Uncritical admiration
© Guy Chapman, 2010
Proudly powered by WordPress. 2010 Weaver by WPWeaver.info